Would be nice if maybe the indent changed? Looks a bit
odd when there's still an indent. Maybe the header (e.g Mesh)
should be differentiated in a way other than indent level
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rB Blender
- Branch
- T89897-semi-collapse-spreadsheet (branched from master)
- Build Status
Buildable 21724 Build 21724: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
I think this might look nice when the region is one or two icon-widths wide, but until it gets there, it mostly looks like text is missing. So I'd suggest lowing the threshold a fair amount.
I also think it would be helpful to have some visual mockups that ignore the constraints of current code. In other words, it would be nice to know what would this smaller view would look like ideally.
Big picture I like the idea-- it would be nice to have the option to use the spreadsheet with a smaller width for the editor, and there is some precedent with things like the names for tools in the 3D view toolbar.
Yeah, I'm not happy with how it looks even with reducing the threshold a lot.
I did these quick mockups, what do you think? I removed the icons from the headers to make it clearer they're headers, not buttons. I think I should've kept the icons for instances n volume grids so that they're consistent with the buttons?


