Nice. The flow layout isn’t so nice here, esp because it flows to two columns first.

Another thing in these panels we should fix, is that the locks are displayed in different ways. For the bone transform panel, we should match the object panel.

The patch should make the locks consistent too, I forgot to mention it. I copied the code from the bone transform UI into the object transform UI, so that should include the way the locks look.

Here is a screenshot of both the Object and Pose Transform tabs before/after the patch.

Maybe the code for drawing the Transforms options should be de-duplicated? I'm still learning when it comes to Blender's code philosophy, but the only challenge for de-duplicating this would be (at least I think), deciding where do we put the function.
Neither properties_object.py or properties_data_bone.py have such helper functions, so if I put it in either of those, it would stick out like a sore thumb. It also doesn't belong to either more than the other.
Maybe we should make a new file for storing functions that help de-duplicate UI code. But I wouldn't know if there's enough of a reason to do that since I'm not that familiar with the UI code. But there's an idea I guess.

From your video and images, this appears not to be the case.

Both object and bone transform panels should expose the lock toggles like so:

I understand why you want to move the Rotation Mode next to the rotation controls. However, it also does make reading the Location/Rotation/Scale values less nice with the enum there in the middle.

At the very least we shouldn't need to call it Rotation Mode, given that it's under the Rotation leader text.

Another option for the rotation mode, is to add it to the Transform panel header:

This puts it more out of the way, and still better communicates that it controls the contents.

I agree under the current layout it could just say "Mode" instead of "Rotation Mode".

I think having it in the header implies to an unknowledgable user that the enum does something to all transforms, not just rotation. The order of these things is the same in the N panel and I think it's fine. As for readability, I think you're usually interested in only location or rotation or scale, as opposed to all three at the same time, so it's okay to have this slight break of flow in between them.

guys please take a look at this idea
"mprove compression and expansion of the attribute editor"
https://blender.community/c/rightclickselect/B0dbbc/

While I like the improvements in that post, it's out of the scope of this patch, or my coding skill level.

In D5454#124017, @Demeter Dzadik (Mets) wrote:

While I like the improvements in that post, it's out of the scope of this patch, or my coding skill level.

ok, Deme, .. sorry but I had to try ^^