The requested changes have been made, could we get another review?
@Joshua Leung (aligorith) @Campbell Barton (campbellbarton)

Much thanks for working with us to get this resolved psy-fi :D

Anybody? Some input about what's required to get this patch accepted is all we're asking for.

It's been months since anyone has responded to this ticket, is there anything that needs to be taken care of for this to be merged?
This is an extremely useful feature for complex light configuration, and is an extremely common algorithm used by most engines, and as Jack rightfully pointed out, it's even part of the COLLADA standard and would greatly reduce the number of assumptions required to convert from inverse-quadratic-coefficients thus simplifying the code required.

I'm a derp, I didn't notice that I was getting redundant joints in there.