Change Details

This method gives really nice results but has some downside: - Require a depth copy or loose the ability to write wire depth to the depth buffer and have correct depth ordering of wires. - Require some depth sampling and prevent early depth test (i.e: has some performance impact). - Has some relatively minor instability with geometry that are perpendicular to the view and intersecting with other geometry. Pros: - Compared to a fullpass approach this is surely going to have less performance impact and much higher quality. - Removes the additional vertex offset. (see T74961) - Fixes all half edges z-fighting. I'm just not sure if this is worth the cost.

This method gives really nice results but has some downside: - Require a depth copy or loose the ability to write wire depth to the depth buffer and have correct depth ordering of wires. - Require some depth sampling and prevent early depth test (i.e: has some performance impact). - Has some relatively minor instability with geometry that are perpendicular to the view and intersecting with other geometry. Pros: - Compared to a fullpass approach this is surely going to have less performance impact and much higher quality. - Removes the additional vertex offset. (see T74961) - Fixes all half edges z-fighting. I'm just not sure if this is worth the cost. {F8428014} {F8428015}

This method gives really nice results but has some downside: - Require a depth copy or loose the ability to write wire depth to the depth buffer and have correct depth ordering of wires. - Require some depth sampling and prevent early depth test (i.e: has some performance impact). - Has some relatively minor instability with geometry that are perpendicular to the view and intersecting with other geometry. Pros: - Compared to a fullpass approach this is surely going to have less performance impact and much higher quality. - Removes the additional vertex offset. (see T74961) - Fixes all half edges z-fighting. I'm just not sure if this is worth the cost. {F8428014} {F8428015}