Change Details

Most of the fields in Mesh had no comments, or outdated misleading comments. For example, "BMESH ONLY" referred to the BMesh project, not the data structure. Given how much these structs are used, it should save a lot of time to have proper comments. I also rearranged the fields in mesh to have a more logical order. Now the most important fields come first. In the process I was able to remove 19 bytes of unnecessary padding (31->12). I just had to change a `short` flag to `char`. My main question is about `MTFace`. Am I correct in assuming that they are deprecated? They are only used in particle code, the explode modifier, and with `MFace`.

Most of the fields in Mesh had no comments, or outdated misleading comments. For example, "BMESH ONLY" referred to the BMesh project, not the data structure. Given how much these structs are used, it should save a lot of time to have proper comments. I also rearranged the fields in mesh to have a more logical order. Now the most important fields come first. In the process I was able to remove 19 bytes of unnecessary padding (31->12). I just had to change a `short` flag to `char`.

Most of the fields in Mesh had no comments, or outdated misleading comments. For example, "BMESH ONLY" referred to the BMesh project, not the data structure. Given how much these structs are used, it should save a lot of time to have proper comments. I also rearranged the fields in mesh to have a more logical order. Now the most important fields come first. In the process I was able to remove 19 bytes of unnecessary padding (31->12). I just had to change a `short` flag to `char`. My main question is about `MTFace`. Am I correct in assuming that they are deprecated? They are only used in particle code, the explode modifier, and with `MFace`.