Change Details

Currently the only "built in" attributes are position attributes, and we only use a few reserved name attributes. We should expose more for lower level data access and flexibility. [ ] normals (vertex, corner, face) [x] material index [ ] tangents [x] vertex colors (color attributes on the face corner domain) [ ] ... A couple other things to consider: 1. It's possible that some of them will need to be read-only. 2. Some types like "bevel weight" don't fit so well in a more generalized attribute system and should likely be versioned to use more generic types like `CD_PROP_FLOAT`.

Currently the only "built in" attributes are position attributes, and we only use a few reserved name attributes. We should expose more for lower level data access and flexibility. [ ] Vertex normals [ ] Face normals [ ] Corner normals ("custom normals") [x] material index [ ] tangents [x] vertex colors (color attributes on the face corner domain) [ ] Index (for each domain) [x] UV maps A couple other things to consider: 1. It's possible that some of them will need to be read-only. 2. Some types like "bevel weight" don't fit so well in a more generalized attribute system and should likely be versioned to use more generic types like `CD_PROP_FLOAT`.

Currently the only "built in" attributes are position attributes, and we only use a few reserved name attributes. We should expose more for lower level data access and flexibility. [ ] Vertex normals (vertex, c [ ] Face normals [ ] Corner, facer normals ("custom normals") [x] material index [ ] tangents [x] vertex colors (color attributes on the face corner domain) [ ] ...Index (for each domain) [x] UV maps A couple other things to consider: 1. It's possible that some of them will need to be read-only. 2. Some types like "bevel weight" don't fit so well in a more generalized attribute system and should likely be versioned to use more generic types like `CD_PROP_FLOAT`.